A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Camping not condos: Saving the Paramount Cottage Camp

1544 W. Oak, 2009

1544 W. Oak, 2009

1544 W. Oak wasn’t always a plain, uninteresting apartment complex. And if its owners have their way, it won’t be one much longer.

“We were talking about tearing the apartments down and building condos,” says owner Maureen Plotnicki.

But then she learned the property had a past. According to city documents, 1544 began as a “cottage camp.” That is, a place where tourists could “enjoy all the recreational opportunities Fort Collins had to offer, without having to ‘rough it’ in a tent or automobile.”   It included a store and a gas station too.

So why don’t we just call the 1928 business  a motel?  For one thing, the word Motel didn’t even enter our dictionaries until after World War II. Also, cottage camps typically weren’t built along highways like motels. In the case of Paramount, it was built to complement the municipal campground just across the street at City Park.

Fort Collins Campground 1925

Fort Collins Campground 1925

Plotnicki says now that she knows that she’s sitting on a historic cottage camp, she doesn’t want to build condos there anymore. Instead, she wants to use the site to “explain some of the history to the community and restore some pride to the property.”

So, she’s nominated 1544 W. Oak for Landmark designation. Then she’ll seek a State Historical Society grant to reconstruct the original sign, flower boxes, roof, siding, and some of the garages.

Plotnicki’s Landmark application has already been approved by the Landmark Preservation Commission, and goes to City Council for a first reading on Tuesday, September 1.

And now I’m going to go all editorial on you: It is rare that historic property owners look beyond trendy magazine interpretations of “old house” (NeoCraftsman with a Tuscan kitchen anyone?) and really seek out a building’s true context.

In Fort Collins, especially, where most of the properties were never grand, it takes a certain understanding to see the beauty in the modest scale of most of our buildings and work to toward restoring that. Big thanks and regards to the owners of 1544 W. Oak.  I think they’ll enrich the whole neighborhood and set a great example because of their vision.

Credits

To learn more about the history of the Paramount Cottage Camp (like how 1928 hotel owners petitioned to have it shut down for being too competitive), download the PDF application here.

Camp photo: University Historic Photograph Collection, http://lib.colostate.edu/archives/historic_photos.html, Colorado State University, Archives and Special Collections

3 comments to Camping not condos: Saving the Paramount Cottage Camp

  • About that “building’s true context” thing. I’ve been coming back to that over and over again as we do our remodel. I’ll go searching for lamps and if I ask for something bungalow styled it tends to have lots of colored glass and geometric designs across it. But that doesn’t fit our house at all. Our house was very basic and plain jane and I’m trying to keep to that as I pick out new fixtures.

    In fact, I sat down at the computer just now to look up balusters. I looked up a site with balusters and saw all sorts of rounded, shaped pieces and none of them grabbed me as being even remotely close to what would fit well into our house. So (duh) I then looked up bungalow balusters and found several plain square pieces with slightly fancier end pieces and viola! that’s it! It just *feels* more like my house. (It also feels a bit more mission style.)

    I find that Southern California bungalows and Northeast Coast bungalows seem to dominate the style books when it comes to designing. But what I see in Fort Collins seems to be a bit less art deco and a bit more straight lines and simple designs.

  • When this one first came up for review at the Landmark Preservation Commission, I struggled with it. I found the history remarkable, but no much of the fabric of the structures has been lost with remuddling. However, after learning of the owners intent to refurbish them, and bring back most of the original character, I became extremely interested. It is not often that we find owners willing to shelve redevelopment plans to preserve a historic piece of property. It is even more rare to find that owner that then wants to restore that same piece of property.

    My hats off to them.

  • I give the owners a standing ovation and look forward to visiting the completed project (which I hope you’ll post about here). 😀